Tom Kelliher, CS 200
Feb. 3, 2004
Read Chapter 3.
Pick one of the four case studies from this class and two of the three
ethical approaches mentioned in class. Starting from the key issues we
identified in class, analyze the case study from the perspective of each of
the ethical approaches you selected. Work in groups of two or three,
utilizing the dialectic process.
- The dialectic process.
- Descriptive and normative claims.
- Philosophical points of view:
- Intrinsic and instrumental value.
- Rules versus acts.
- Moral agency.
- The categorical imperative.
- Virtue ethics:
- List of virtues.
- Addresses un-addressed question of moral character.
- Useful for describing ethical professional behavior.
- Derivable from ethical theories.
- Positive and negative rights.
- Social contract theories.
- Rawlsian justice.
- John, a college student, frequently participates in YellowMUD. One
morning, the college's network administrator, Jane, arrives to find an
e-mail from YellowMUD's administrator, Sam, accusing John of severely
abusing several other YellowMUD participants and providing recorded scripts
of the event as proof. Sam has terminated John's YellowMUD account and
also demands that Jane terminate John's college network account. John
claims that Sam dislikes him, has been out to get him, and that the script
is a fabrication. Jane disables John's network account and refers the case
to the college's honor board. As a result, John can't complete required
coursework. John approaches Tom and asks him for assistance in the
defense. Tom agrees. Jane, not being very familiar with MUDs, their
surveillance capabilities, the feasibility of fabrication, nor how to
approach Sam for additional evidence, relies upon Tom's advice in
collecting information for the case. Has Jane behaved ethically in
immediately suspending John's account? Has Tom behaved ethically in
helping both sides? (From a situation in which I found myself years ago.)
- It is 1994 and the Web is just beginning to take off. Tom is an
assistant computer science professor at a small, rural, conservative,
religious-affiliated college. The college doesn't yet have its own Web
site. George, one of Tom's students, asks Tom for an independent study
project. Tom suggests that George set up a Web server on the department's
server and then begin to build a Web site for the college. Tom mentions
this idea to the college's IT director and all agree that it's a great
idea. A semester later, George has completed the Web site.
(From two situations in which I found myself years ago.)
- One of the parts of the site is a listing of Web sites which might
be of interest to students. Tom notices that this listing includes a
link to a site called ``Condomania.'' He decides to ignore it. The
college's conservative culture would not support such a link, but Tom
reasons that this is something which could be of use to students. A
month later, Ralph, another faculty member, comes across this link while
browsing the Web site and points out its problematical nature to Tom.
Tom removes the link, later informing George of the deletion. George
doesn't object. On the two counts of initially allowing the link to
persist, and then later removing it himself rather than having George
remove it, has Tom acted ethically?
- Another part of the Web site contains smaller sites for the
college's sororities and fraternities. 's Web site contains a page
of links to the fraternity's alumni's Web sites on various other Web
servers. Fred, one of the linked alumni, has a link to
pornography buried within his Web site. The college's development
director, Don, himself a alumnus, discovers the pornography.
Several interested parties, including Don, Mike (a officer), and
Tom, meet to discuss the link. Don maintains that pornography
shouldn't be included in the college's Web site. Mike argues that
Fred's Web site isn't part of the college's site and that this is
censorship. Tom observes that from many ``safe'' Web pages it's
possible to reach pornographic content by following just a few links and
that most Web users understand that once they leave one Web site via a
link to another site, the first Web site is not expected to exert any
control of the second site's content. What should be done?
- Tom, an associate professor, tends to have a bias against large
corporations and is a long-time user of Unix, which he quite regularly uses
rather than using Windows. For several years, he has been following the
Microsoft anti-trust case and he ultimately decides that Microsoft will
never compete fairly within the marketplace. The facts of the case and
Microsoft's subsequent behavior appear to support his conclusion. As a
result, Tom pledges to have as little to do with Microsoft products as
possible. At the conclusion of each academic year, each member of the
college's faculty is required to send an updated copy of their vita and a
description of all their accomplishments for the year to the Academic
Dean's secretary. The secretary compiles all this information for later
presentation to the trustees. Obviously, it is a lot of work. Tom
prepares his documents in his usual way, within Unix, converts them to PDF
format, and then sends them along to the Dean's office. All other faculty
submit documents in MS Word format. Technically, the Dean's secretary can
read Tom's documents and include them in the summary reports, but it is
trying to cut-and-paste from Acrobat Reader to Word and then re-format the
verbiage. Tom is aware of this. The Dean's secretary has not objected to
Tom's use of PDF format. Has Tom acted ethically?
(My current dilemma.)
Thomas P. Kelliher
Fri Jan 30 19:21:22 EST 2004